State Sponsored Terror Group by Erick San Juan

State Sponsored Terror Group by Erick San Juan


Many people in the world especially the Islamic nations were astounded as to where this terrorist group ISIS came from? Just like the Al Qaeda, ISIS( Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) started as freedom fighters and metamorphosed into super warriors more mightier than the Al Qaeda and the Taliban combined. Most of it's components according to reports are not even born in the Middle East but Arab-Americans, Muslim-Europeans, British, Australians and according to former President Fidel Ramos, more than a hundred Filipino Muslim Jihadists who are members of the BIFF and the Abu Sayyaf's went to Syria to join and be trained by ISIS.

James Dorsey of the Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore Aug.14,2014 wrote that US President Barack Obama's decision to launch air strikes against Islamic State Jihadists in Iraq is fraught with pitfalls and could persuade IS to consolidate it's position in Syria, in the knowledge that Obama is likely to salvage the regime of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad.

Kevin Barrett, editor of Veterans Today, August 12, 2014 believed that Israel is either committing suicide or insane. He cited former US Senate Counsel Jeff Gates, author of Guilt by Association saying that Zionist actions, no matter how crazy they look, are the product of elaborate strategic calculations. He wrote that the Zionists are master of game theory- a psychopatic technique for following utterly amoral mathematical self-interest in pursuing ones objectives.

Barrett argued that if Gates is right, the Zionists must be taking desperate measures because they are in a desperate situation. They are facing a demographic challenge, the Palestinians resistance in getting better at asymmetrical warfare and global public opinion is gradually and inexorably turning against them.

Michael Singh, the managing director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former senior director for the Middle East Affairs of the US National Security Council, in his article at the International New York Times, 8/20/14, said that President Obama surprised many recently when he diagnosed the crisis gripping Iraq as partly an economic one, noting that the Iraqi Sunnis were detached from the global economy and thus frustrated in achieving their aspirations.

Singh disclosed that while Iraq's chaos has many sources, Obama is nevertheless 'on to something' and it's not just Iraqi Sunnis, but the entire Middle East that is detached from the global economy. The economies of the Middle East are not only detached from the world's but from one another. Economies and politics are inextricably linked. And economic progress is the key to easing the chronic instability that threatens American interests in the region.

As I've been saying in the past that politics begins and ends in economics, Singh was partly right in his assessment. But he has not answered fully his query as to why Obama made a surprise order to attack the ISIS in Iraq.

According to James Dorsey of RSIS,"With tens of thousands of Yasidis trapped by the Jihadists on a mountain in Northern Iraq under dire circumstances and the security of the Iraqi Kurdistan, with Iraq's most stable region under threat, Obama had little choice but to take action. Growing Saudi-fueled sectarianism in the Middle East is likely to backfire on the US effort as many Sunnis will perceive the air strikes as an expression of a pro-Shiite policy. Sunnis believe that the US policy had brought Shiites to power in Iraq with the toppling of Sunni strongman, Saddam Hussein."(During the Babylonian festivities in the past hosted by Saddam, I found out that the hexagram symbol now being used by Israel in their flag was the former emblem of the Yasidis.)

Pundits believe that the air strike launched by Obama was well calculated, the way the American elite kicked out several of their 'Frankenstein' worldwide including Marcos, Saddam, Hosni Mubarak, recently Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood and Iraq's former Prime Minister Al Maliki.

According to Mohamed Bin Ali of RSIS (June 30,2014) the plan was to create levels of conflict. "First is a sectarian one between Sunnis and the Shiite regime. The second level is ideologically motivated attacks. The third is the humanitarian level where there's a humanitarian crisis to justify intervention. Many are radicalized by what they see and who they come into contact within. Syria as an example is undergoing a political  conflict that serves as the newest hotspot attracting scores of foreign fighters like ISIS, ISIL, etc.".

Sounds familiar!  The pattern is getting clearer. That was how the Al Qaeda was created by Osama bin Laden, another state-sponsored  terrorist who was sacrificed after winning his war against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Even the popular  geopolitical analyst, Prof. Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research (June 14, 2014) commented that there is an ongoing engineered destruction and political fragmentation of Iraq towards the creation of a US sponsored Islamist Caliphate.  He explained that the Al Qaeda affiliated entities have been used by US-NATO in numerous conflicts as 'intelligence assets' since the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war. In Syria, the Al Nusrah and the ISIS rebels are the foot soldiers of the western military alliance which oversee and control the recruitment and training of paramilitary forces using different names and acronyms.

Chossudovsky concluded that the plan was to support both sides. The war on terror created the Al Qaeda terrorist entities as part of an intelligence operation, as well as rescuing governments which are the target of terrorist insurgency. This process is reportedly carried out under the banner of counter-terrorism. It creates the pretext to intervene.

ISIS is allegedly a 'Caliphate project' of creating a Sunni Islamist state. It is neither a project of the Sunni population of Iraq. It is a part of a US intelligence agenda. The Islamic Caliphate is allegedly supported covertly by the CIA in liaison with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Turkish intelligence. He confirmed that Israel also channeled support to Al Qaeda rebels in Syria as well as to the Kurdish separatists.

"The endgame is to destabilize sovereign nation states and to transform countries into open territories on behalf of the so called foreign investors.",Chossudovsky  stated. A Filipino Islamic scholar told me the other day that Muslims worldwide are watching  carefully the possible scenario of how the Zionists will take over the Golden mosque in Jerusalem and the ongoing atrocities in Gaza. They are also monitoring the ISIS no 'mercy strategy' in killing Muslims and the possible pretext in destroying the 'Dome of the Rock', the 'perceived hindrance' in building the Zionists third temple. He added that the Muslim world will fight back including Arab states allied to Israel. His nightmare is the possible intervention of the western allies. He's getting feedback from the US that the Zionist Americans controlling the US government wanted to help the Israelis in getting the Arab lands to fast-track the creation of a Greater Israel.

The scholar foresee that the beheading of the American freelance journalist James Foley could be the justification for the US government's all out intervention to assist Israel on the road to Armageddon.

God forbid!

Are we secured? By Erick San Juan

 Are we secured? By Erick San Juan

Security is the most complicated issue associated with the construction of new architecture in the Asia Pacific region especially with the ASEAN countries as the center. Traditionally bilateral treaties are the main components of security in the region. During the Cold War, the system of regional security was based on the 'umbrella' principle. In those years, the US created an extensive network of quasi-alliance consisting of nation-states, not related through multilateral formats of security apparatus but committed to Washington. The US initially opposed a multilateral security system in the Asia Pacific region, recognizing it as a threat to the existing bilateral agreements.

Even after the end of the Cold War and the disappearance of bipolar  confrontation, security architecture in the region has not changed. Moreover, Washington draws a line in modifying military-political alliances with key allies like Japan, South Korea, Australia, Philippines and Thailand, as well as strengthening the network of new partners such as India, Indonesia, Vietnam and Myanmar. The west operates without regard to the countries approaches to their national security and seek their greater susceptibility to models of regional integration as promoted by the Americans. At a time when countries in Asia Pacific are trying to reduce tensions in the region, Washington OK'd Japan's modernization  of it's military and national security. Observers believed that Japan will support the US in their military-political activities in the region. No doubt about it, because Japan after the second world war became a close ally of the USA and it became an integral partner of the Trilateral Commission which started as a global organization of Japan,US and Europe whose early mandate was to return the war loots where they belong.

With this commitment of the Japanese government, plus the saber-rattling with China, it has to change and modify it's constitution. A radical departure from it's being a non-nuclear state, a country who learned from it's past mistakes and has refused to participate in wars anymore. With the impending threat from China, it is now devoted to the joint activities with the west.

Good for the Japanese? What about us and the other Asian neighbors? Any escalation of war in the region, whether we like it or not, we will be drag to go to war again. The big question mark is- "Are we secured? Will our big brother Americans help us?"

In the recent article of Victor Avecilla at the Manila Standard, August 12,2014, he asked this question- "In the event that a shooting  war breaks out between the Philippines and Communist China, will the US  and the UK be just as ready to assist Manila in the fighting?"

Avecilla cited  the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty between Manila and Washington DC and legally speaking, the US is duty bound to rescue us. (Yes we ratified it but the US Congress did not). He added that it is impossible for the Americans to intervene especially now that America is in financial crisis. (Plus the US owe China trillions of dollars). He also cited some pundits that the US will still help the Philippines because America cannot afford to allow the sea lanes in East and South East Asia converted into a Chinese lake.

Just like what my pro-American father warned me in the past that the Americans are good people per se but you can't trust all the people running it's government. Even Mr. Avecilla commented, "Sadly, the historical record provides Manila reason to doubt if America can be taken on it's word.

To quote- "In December 1941, when the Japanese invaded the Philippine Islands after their sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, US President  Franklin D. Roosevelt sent word to Manila that reinforcements were on their way to America's citadel in the Far East. Those promised reinforcements never came."

"The US had no colonies in Europe at that time, but it had one in the Pacific-the Philippine Islands. In 1942, President Roosevelt agreed with the UK that the war in Europe against Germany and Italy shall take priority over the war in the Pacific against Japan. Meanwhile, the Philippines had to bear the ordeal of brutal enemy occupation."

"After the successful invasion of France by allied forces in June 1944, Roosevelt focused his attention to the Pacific. The original plan was that the US military forces will by-pass the Philippines and launch the allied offensive against Japan from Formosa(now Taiwan). Fortunately, General Douglas McArthur vehemently objected to that plan and prevailed on Roosevelt to liberate the Philippine Islands prior to an invasion of Japan."    That was the American version of history. The truth of the matter, when the US government found out that Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita was already in Manila to collect the war loots, Roosevelt immediately instructed MacArthur to return to Manila and locate Yamashita.

Avecilla narrated that in contrast  to the way the US treated us, a former colony, it invested heavily in the economic recovery  of its erstwhile enemies- Germany and Japan.

There were several inconsistencies in history which I unmasked in my book, 'Raiders of the Lost Gold. Lastly, Avecilla stated that the historical record may be subject to various interpretations but there is one message it clearly conveys-'that the Philippine government will be better off assuming that no military  assistance will readily come from foreign countries in the event a shooting war does take place against China and that the Philippines should start beefing up it's military arsenal immediately and explore unconventional diplomatic solutions to the serious breach of Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea.'

Need I say more?

News They Want Us To Believe by Erick San Juan

News They Want Us To Believe by Erick San Juan

I got curious when an American like Sen. Ron Paul attack the mistakes of his government. Its  more amazing when a British patriot like Ken Fuller  of Daily Tribune exposed the wrong doing of his nations most popular TV network, BBC.  He kidded that a joke has been circulated on the internet regarding BBC's TV newsreader saying, "Here is what we want you to believe." He said the reality is, it gives rise to anger and not laughter.

He cited the media bias of British Broadcasting Corporation which he called the 'Biased Broadcasting Corporation' in reporting the alleged Israel's systematic murder of Palestinians in Gaza and the downing of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 over the eastern Ukraine.(Daily Tribune 8/12/14)

There are several conflicting stories and blame game emanating from both sides of the fence. Western media pinpointed the Russians and pro-Russian rebels as the culprit while most international reports suggest that Kiev forces were responsible for the crush of MH17.

Fuller cited the conservative Manila Times July 18 story where two Ukrainian fighter jets were seen trailing the Malaysian commercial jet before it was brought down. He reiterated the query of Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov as to why did the Ukraine air traffic controllers allow MH17 to deviate from the regular route to the north towards the conflict zone and what happened to the observation of a Spanish air traffic controller?

"On July 23, the BBC's Russian service ran a video also showing that eyewitnesses on the ground confirmed the presence of Ukrainian military aircraft when MH17 was hit. The BBC's Olga Ivshina told viewers that the Ukrainian Security Service had produced a video and photos purporting to prove that a BUK missile had been used."

Fuller debunked Ivshina's allegation. He commented that Ivshina and her crew were unable to find any evidence of a missile launch in the area. "The local militia told the BBC that it did not have weaponry capable of hitting aircraft at high altitude." He stated that the video is viral  and still accessible via globalresearch.com.

Citing another internet report, international experts perceived the confluence of events connected with the disappearance of the Malaysian Airlines MH370 last March (I have written about it. Read it at www.ericksanjuan.blogspot.com) and the plane crash in Ukraine last month as the west's desire to mislead the international community and create a situation with their version of events. According to a well known journalist Nigel Cawthorne, almost a similar incident happened this year when a plane flying to Beijing was hit by a missile mistakenly unleashed in the course of secret military exercises conducted by the US and Thailand in South China Sea. Cawthorne explained that an emergency situation happened during the military maneuvers which resulted in an incident where a commercial jet became an unwitting target and was shot down. In this kind of scenario, no one will admit a mistake because for sure, it will complicate relations with several nations especially China where hundreds of its nationals were the passengers and casualties.

To avoid similarities of another incident in 1988, when an American cruiser ship shot down an Iranian passenger plane in the Persian Gulf, the western media quickly  made a report about the error in the calculated search area and black boxes found off the coast of Australia.

Cawthorne analyzed the said military exercises which was carried out simultaneously at the time of the disappearance of MH370. Eyewitness testimonies published an account of a burning plane falling in the Gulf of Siam. Cawthorne argued that such military 'mistakes' happen quite often. However, aviation experts assured him that the plane can not disappear without a trace.

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Muhamad Mahathir had a similar position and analysis as to the MH370 incident. In his blog, he called the search operation as a waste of time and money. He stated that given the fact that during the first hours after the tragedy, experts from CIA, FBI, and MI6 were engaged on searching for the missing aircraft. He claimed that the west's intelligence community could be hiding the information about the circumstances of the plane's disappearance. He also noted that the 'Boeing' company was able to remote control over the devices of the aircraft. But the absence of the data indicated the closure of access to information by concerned parties. Mahathir believed that there was a cover up somewhere.

Uncovered intelligence reports showed a pattern of past incidents as a pretext. One of them was in the memoir of former US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara who in March 1962 considered the CIA proposal on how to use a large scale provocation to organize an invasion of Cuba. The plan was to create an incident that would convincingly demonstrate that a Cuban fighter jet can shot down a chartered aircraft with students on board. The scenario would push the US to attack Cuba with the support of the media and the international community.

This could be the reason why pundits always give a second thought when such dastardly act happens. In the book, "Why Are We At War? By Norman Mailer, he explained that some American leaders pursue war not in the name of security or anti-terrorism or human rights but in an undeclared yet fully realized ambition of global empire.

Thanks to the patriotic Americans and westerners who leaked to the world this kind of plans by some arms dealer controlling governments to make profit out of chaos.

Ebola: Profit Out of Pandemic by Erick San Juan

 Ebola: Profit Out of Pandemic by Erick San Juan

While watching the GMA TV News Monday night, I was alarmed instead of relaxing by the statement of a Department of Health official when he said that the Philippines is still Ebola free despite those OFW's (Overseas Filipino Workers) who came from Africa are still under quarantine. Which is which?

Hernan, a friend of mine , emailed me this Monday morning a report coming from before its news.com saying that the Philippines has a reported first suspected case of Ebola virus according to our country's health officials. Seven workers who allegedly returned to the Philippines from Sierra Leone were showing symptoms similar to that of the tropical virus.

The Ministry of Internal Affairs, Mr. Morris Dukuly, has disclosed that a Liberian has died of the deadly Ebola virus in Morocco. According to the blog, a man who landed at Guarulhos Airport in Sao Paulo was taken to a hospital, Emilio Ribas, capital of the Central Region and was hospitalized in an isolated area. The African, whose name was not revealed, undergoes tests that may reveal Ebola contamination.(Source:luismmx.blogspot.com).

I was skeptical from the start but I have a lot of research on Pharma's scare mongering and profit out of crisis through pandemic plan.  Now the global scammers are being unmasked by righteous scientists, intelligence officers and doctors doing research on virus.

I was even warned by Sherry, my Singaporean friend that it looks like the Ebola epidemic is like the medical movie, "OUTBREAK", filmed in 1995 starred by Dustin Hoffman, Rene Russo and Morgan Freeman is turning real.

The international news gave several frightful accounts of the Ebola outbreak saying that Ebola contamination is now a top of travelers' worry(7/30/14 INY Times). Scientists warned that Ebola virus disease vaccine is hardly guaranteed to be successful (PDI 8/3/14). The worst mouthpiece for fear mongering came from WHO chief Margaret Chan when she claimed that this is the worst outbreak and she fears catastrophe if Ebola gets out of control ( Manila Standard 8/3/14). I remember that Chan, 'the WHO chief who cried wolf' also warned the whole world before that the flu virus will become pandemic. The Philippine Star quoting Agence France Presse reported that the fruit bats were being blamed and considered the natural host of the Ebola virus. The AFP report said that there is no vaccine or cure yet.

The intellihub.com and Mike Adams of Natural News gave a detailed account on 'Why does the US CDC own a patent on Ebola invention?'  Adams said that the US Center for Disease Control owns the patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as EboBun. It's patent No. CA2741523A1 and it was awarded in 2010. EboBun is reportedly not the same variant circulating in West Africa. Adams accused the CDC expanding its patent portfolio to include more strains and that may be the reason why the American Ebola victims were brought to the US.

The CDC allegedly wanted to harvest Ebola from the victims so they can file patents. From the patent description on the EboBun virus, the CDC wanted to extract Ebola viruses from patients, claims to have 'invented' the virus and then file for the monopoly of the patent protection on the virus.

"The patent is a government enforced monopoly that is exclusively granted to persons or organizations. It allows the exclusive PROFIT from the invention."

"So why would the US government claim to have 'invented' Ebola and then claim an exclusive monopoly over it's ownership?", Adam asked. The summary of the invention section of the patent document claimed that the CDC is claiming ownership over all Ebola viruses.

The CDC reportedly claimed patent protection  on a method for propagating the Ebola virus in host cells as well as treating infected hosts with vaccines. The CDC clearly desired to expand its patent portfolio by harvesting, studying and potentially patenting new strains or variants.

Dr. Bob Arnot, an infectious disease specialist who spent time saving lives, recently told Fox News 'Justice' TV show hosted by Judge Jeanine that there is no medical reason to bring Dr. Bradley and his assistant to the US for medication against Ebola. Dr.Adams believe that there's an entirely different reason to bring Ebola patients to America so that they can be exploited for medical experiments, military bioweapon harvesting and intellectual property claims.

The medical authorities at Emory University Hospital and the CDC are working hard to save the lives of the two American patients who have been transported to the US from West Africa but they are also pursuing something else at the same time. Meaning isolating, identifying and patenting infectious disease agents for reasons that we can only imagine.

Dr. Adams  stated that billions of dollars in profits are at stake in all this. Shares of TEKMIRA, the pharmaceutical company handling the vaccine for Ebola, surged over 11% last week as pressure was placed on the FDA to fast-track Ebola vaccine trials the company has set up.

"With this, we start to see the structure of the elaborate medical theater coming together- a global pandemic panic,a government patent, the importation of Ebola into a major US city, an experimental vaccine, the rise of a little known pharmaceutical company and a public outcry for the FDA(Food and Drug Administration) to fast-track the production of the vaccine. This medical  theater might someday involve a 'laboratory accident' in a US lab, the 'escape' of Ebola into the population and a mandatory nationwide Ebola vaccination campaign that enriches TEKMIRA and its investors while positioning the CDC with its virus patents as the 'savior' of the American people." Dr. Adams concluded.

This could be a very good nightmarish script possibly made in Hollywood and overheard from the WHO's flu hoax.  The Health Ranger  explained the formula is always the same- create hysteria, bring a vaccine to market, then scare governments into buying billions of dollars worth of vaccines they don't need.

From the NSSM200 of Henry Kissinger and the Bill and Melinda Gates crusade to vaccinate every single child on the planet specifically the continent of Africa as the solution to depopulate nations which they perceived as useless eaters, be very afraid!